Chris' Blog
Jun 23

You can read the Daily Herald piece here.

To make a good decision, voters need to think about who is better suited for life in the House of Representatives — the day-to-day job of working with 434 other people of all viewpoints to move legislation through, or block it.

Cannon is sometimes faintly praised as being detail-oriented, as if he is not a big-picture person. We don’t find that to be the case. Daily Herald staffers have grilled him on several occasions recently, and he showed not only that he knows the minutiae of legislation, he also has an impressive, wide-ranging vision of how government can change in a technological society.

Anybody who sits with Cannon, as we have done, cannot miss his grasp of issues, his affability and his inner drive. Such qualities suit him well for the job of congressman.

No Comments

 

Jun 23

Congressman Chris Cannon’s remarks:

I am not a George W. Bush Republican.  Nor am I a Ronald Reagan Republican.  I am a Utah Conservative.

Make no mistake – I proudly served in the Reagan Administration, and while my opponent was campaigning for Michael Dukakis, I was supporting the Republican nominee for President.  My point is that what really matters when it comes to representing the 3rd District in Congress is principled beliefs and the ability to turn those beliefs into results.
Jason Chaffetz gives a good speech.  I told him so as he left the podium at the convention. 

He is well packaged, and looks good on camera.  On the other hand, as Bob points out, I sometimes get too deep into a subject and lose my listeners with detail, but I know how to move legislation.  My record proves that.  And Congress is full of people who give great speeches, but have very little to show for it.  

I still believe we are the party of ideas.  I still believe we are the party that inspires through our message, not our messengers.  I believe we are the party of leaders, not cheerleaders.  I believe we are the party that can legislate, and inspire.  

I for one, refuse to believe we have been relegated to casual observers on the American stage.  I for one refuse to believe the Republican Party I worked my life to build is sidelined.  

I for one refuse to believe that my conservative roots are second to someone who spent his formative years tearing down our icons, while I spent them trying to build them up.  

I also refuse to believe we are out of power for the foreseeable future. There are over 60 members of the House of Representatives today who are in districts that President Bush won in 2004.  In addition, Democrats are not likely to reach 60 votes in the Senate. If John McCain becomes President, we will have the veto pen over pork barrel spending and other legislation.  If, on the other hand, Barack Obama becomes President, we will no doubt bear the fruits of his disastrous socialistic policies.

But, in one respect Bob is right, we will and do have work to do.  When we return to power - and we will - all the speeches and all the face time will mean nothing in an institution built by our founders to be labyrinthian in complexity and plodding in execution.  My opponent will say all the right things, but as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton compromised to create the Federalist Papers, so too must a member of Congress be willing to listen more often than he speaks.  He must also never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  The breadth and depth to legislate our way out of this socialistic morass is staggering, but possible.

Imagine how far we have come since Jimmy Carter’s 90% tax bracket.  We are not where we need to be yet, but due to time and pressure, the two constants the Lord put to work in earth’s geology, America has gotten better, and we will continue to be the catalyst for that progress because we are the party of ideas.

My opponent will continue to try and label me as part of the problem.  His entire campaign is built on the premise that doing nothing is better than doing something. Stopping everything is better than working for something. 

Yes, I did vote for No Child Left Behind.  It was the promise of a new paradigm in education - local control and removing the federal government from the classroom.  I and many other conservatives wanted to give it a shot.  The Status quo was unacceptable and it seemed like hope.  It didn’t work out that way, and must be done away with.  

But imagine if on every issue, when presented with an option to change the status quo, we all did nothing.  That is what my opponent represents.  That is not the Republicanism of Ronald Reagan, who tore down that wall.  That is not the Republicanism of Abraham Lincoln, who epitomized the politics of the possible. 

That is the politics of fear.  The politics of prevarication.  And if I may say so, the politics of the Democrat Party.  If both parties stand astride history or a FoxNews TV screen, screaming NO at each other, it won’t solve problems.  Hard work, study, depth of understanding, and devotion to principle will.  Those are Utah values and Conservative credentials.  That is a Utah Conservative…that is me.   

Thank You.
- Rep. Chris Cannon

3 Comments

 

Jun 21

On Friday, Former Speaker Newt Gingrich asked me to join his Drill Now, Drill Here, Pay Less movement @ American Solutions. I am proud to join the others who have been asked to join.

Some are my colleagues in the House, others are State legislators. This movement will supplement my work in Congress to get oil shale into development and will assist the Western Caucus, of which I am chairman, in our work when we introduce a comprehensive energy bill on July 4th. This movement transcends party and geography. This is about American sovereignty. Please join the Speaker and look for our comprehensive legislation soon.

No Comments

 

Jun 19

Jason vs. Jason

Posted by: Chris Cannon  | 

My opponent continues to say things that make us all shake our heads in disbelief. Some are outright falsehoods, some are just his misunderstanding of votes (In fairness, reading the voting record that the House provides online can be challenging, so his rampant mistakes in that regard are at least understandable). Beyond the mistakes, however, is the changing positions. Like John Kerry in 2004, Jason continues to try and reinvent himself in front of our very eyes, while flip flopping on major issues and his past. For example:

JASON vs. JASON

  1. On His Previous Life as a Democrat


NOW
: “I disagreed with most, if not all, of the issues,” of Michael Dukakis. (Salt Lake Tribune, Today, June 19th)

THEN
: “I believe in Michael Dukakis as a person, and in his political views.” BYU Daily Universe, Sept. 16, 1988

THEN
: “Throughout Chaffetz’s travels with Dukakis, he has met Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sen. Albert Gore, Sen. Ted Kennedy…and actor Robert Redford.” BYU Daily Universe, Sept. 16, 1988

     
  1. On Earmarks


NOW
: “I will stay in close communication with local police authorities to make sure they have the tools and protections they need on a federal level to enforce the law and keep us safe.” AND “I support funding for radar at both the Provo and West Jordan airports.” (jasonforcongress.com)
Note: ALL OF THESE PROJECTS ARE DONE THROUGH AN EARMARK
THEN
: Jason will refuse to, “seek, support, or enact earmarks.” (Jasonforcongress.com)

  1. On Immigration


NOW
: “…we should allow current illegal aliens to come forward and apply for a short term work visa if done in conjunction with a sponsoring legal business.”
Note: Evidently illegals can commit a “felony” and stay in the country with no penalty. That is amnesty!
THEN
: “I reject amnesty.” AND Jason supports putting illegals in tent cities to be deported AND “Illegal immigration should be a felony aggravating factor.” (Jasonforcongress.com and his convention speech)

  1. On Energy

NOW: No mention of drilling, ANWR, Oil Shale, Coal to Liquid, etc on his website. Only says America must be, “energy independent.” (jasonforcongress.com)THEN: “Chaffetz said. “He’s [Cannon]out there telling people [that drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge] would drop the cost of a gallon of gas to $1.50, when in reality it may make a difference of 2 to 2.5 cents.” (The Hill, July 31, 2007)
N
ote
: Even MSNBC, a left wing network, acknowledges that ANWR drilling would lower prices AT LEAST 50 cents. 50 cents means a lot to working Americans, but not to Jason Chaffetz as he sits with his feet up in his 5,000 square foot mansion.

  1. On George Bush


NOW
: “A life in pictures: Chaffetz’ home office is covered in framed photographs and papers documenting his life…photos of President Reagan, Henry Kissinger, President Ford and former President Bush.” (Salt Lake Tribune, July 19th, 2008)

THEN
: “The [Dukakis] campaign has raised millions of dollars from literally thousands of individuals. That is different from George [H.W.] Bush, who accepts millions of dollars from PACs…The story may be in who is “buying” George Bush.” (Jason Chaffetz, letter to the editor, BYU Daily Universe)

Note
: Jason uses the same line of argument against Chris Cannon that he used against President George H.W. Bush. In addition, Jason accepts PAC money from Utah Banks who continue to oppose Congressman Cannon’s efforts to force competition into the Credit Card and Banking markets.

  1. On Campaign Debt


NOW
: “I will not go into debt in this campaign. Mr. Cannon has been in debt since he was elected in 1996. How you run your campaign is how you will operate in office. And I absolutely refuse to go into debt and have to ask lobbyists to bail me out,” (DesNews, May 15th, 2008) AND “How sad to think that you have to be able to go into debt to run a campaign,” Chaffetz said. (Salt Lake Tribune, April 18th, 2008)

THEN
: “I think it’s only natural that a candidate invests in his own campaign. I would think voters would worry if somebody didn’t,” (Jason Chaffetz, in regards to Governor Hunstman’s campaign being in debt, including debt to the Governor himself. (Salt Lake Tribune, Sept. 16th, 2004)

Note
: Over half of the debt Jason discusses on the campaign trail is to Congressman Cannon himself. Chris “invested in his own campaign” as Jason puts it, in previous races.

  1. On Governor Huntsman

NOW: “Jason Chaffetz had no problem slamming Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. when he spoke in front of a crowd of hard-core Republicans at the state convention last month. But voters in the 3rd District got a door-hanger this week, boasting of the kind praise he received from Huntsman as he was departing the governor’s office in 2005. “Our office was surprised to see the mailer included a quote from the governor given other statements made by the candidate,” said Lisa Roskelley, spokeswoman for the governor. “The statement was not intended for campaign literature.” She would not say if the governor stood by his 2005 statement.Huntsman said last month that he had not discussed the slight with Chaffetz, and would not respond to the criticism. “I don’t think that returning a cheap shot makes for a good political dialogue,” he said.” (Salt Lake Tribune, June 19th, 2008)

4 Comments

 

Jun 18

For letting us get the message of American Energy Independence out there.  There will be much more to come, but in the meantime, check out these two clips.  I also truly appreciate all the comments on this blog from Americans around the country who stand with us to make sure America is energy independent NOW!

1 Comment

 

Jun 16

Click here to see a few folks talk about my campaign.

Thanks!

6 Comments

 

Jun 11

I did not just come to this debate like many.  As you can see below, just this Congress, I have been pushing this for years. 

Check out the following clips to see what else I have been up to the last year on oil shale.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnKrX4hW5Ww

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwLTqzRFShE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zX_AFQQ6DGc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PilYCPVqOwQ

http://congcannon.blip.tv/file/924814/

http://congcannon.blip.tv/file/924814/

http://congcannon.blip.tv/file/984406/

No Comments

 

Jun 11

Knowledge is Power

Posted by: Chris Cannon  | 

I was honored to be recognized by the Abstinence Clearinghouse for my work to ensure our kids know the value of living pure and faith centered lives.  The text of the alert sent to their members can be read below:

THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE CHRIS CANNON!:In late April, House Oversight and Government Reform of Representatives held a biased and one-sided hearing in the Oversight & Government Reform Committee which attacked the effectiveness of abstinence education. Led by Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA), the panel for the April 23rd hearing was stacked with witnesses who opposed abstinence education. Senator Sam Brownback and researcher Stan Weed did an excellent job of presenting the view that abstinence is effective, but the hearing failed to present the views of parents, students and teachers who support abstinence until marriage education. Clearly, the goal of the hearing was to downplay and distort the positive effects of abstinence-until-marriage programs.

The National Abstinence Clearinghouse (NAC) would like to thank Representative Chris Cannon (R-UT) for his efforts to ensure that the Committee’s hearing record provided a balanced view of the effectiveness of abstinence education programs. At the request of NAC, Rep. Cannon included in the Committee hearing record a report from the Administration for Children and Families titled “Promising Perspectives for Providing Abstinence Education to High Risk Youth: Perspectives from the Field”. This report, produced in partnership with NAC, shows the promising practices utilized by successful programs across the country for reaching high-risk youth with the message of abstinence education.

While opponents of abstinence education went to great lengths to distort the success of abstinence programs, Congressman Cannon was there to set the record straight.

A preliminary transcript of the hearing can be found HERE.

The National Abstinence Clearinghouse’s letter thanking Representative Cannon can be found HERE.

The federal government should allow local school districts to reflect their residents and let parents set the moral standards their children live by.  However, it is incumbent upon people in leadership positions to advocate for things like abstinence.  The fruits of a permissive culture are evident all around us.  As a parent and a Congressman, I am proud to stand with those who stand for our children.

No Comments

 

Jun 10

I wanted to share with you what I ahve been doing on energy, especially developing Oil Shale here at home.  Contrary to what people like Glen Warchol at the Salt Lake Tribune would have you believe (curious, he includes one line from my press release but does’t include the rest of the release in which my work far beyond the election season on this issue is highlighted), my recent legislation on Oil Shale has nothing to do with an election, and everything to do with ensuring we achieve energy independence and not just talk about it.  For example:

On June 8th, 2007, in the Natural Resources Committee, I attempted to stop Democrats from sealing off all Oil Shale development in America.  That debate can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnKrX4hW5Ww

On June 27th, 2007, I offered an amendment on the floor to limit the Democrat restriction on oil shale development.  A video of Congressman Cannon’s floor debate can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwLTqzRFShE

On June 27th, 2007, Democrats held open a vote on my amendment so that Democrat leaders could switch Democrat votes to ensure Oil Shale was locked away from development.  That video can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zX_AFQQ6DGc

On October 24th, 2007, I, along with Congressman Bishop, implored their fellow members to open Oil Shale development.  That debate can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PilYCPVqOwQ

Two weeks ago, I addressed the issue of Oil Shale on the floor again.  That speech can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHKuB8VwZPY

- American consumers have increased their demand for oil by 12 percent in the last decade, but oil production has grown by less than one half of one percent.  We import 64 percent of our oil today.

- Of the estimated 2.7 trillion barrels of oil held in the world’s oil shale deposits, 2 trillion is scattered across the United States. That’s more oil than all the countries in the Middle East combined. Estimates of the recoverable oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.2 to 1.8 trillion barrels.  That is the equivalent of 1-2 times the total world crude oil reserves – triple the amount of oil reserves in Saudi Arabia. 

- 1.2 trillion barrels of oil is enough oil to meet the current U.S. demands for more than 100 years.

- The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that the United States is the richest and most geographically concentrated oil shale and tar sands resource in the world.

- Oil shale could allow the U.S. to become the world’s single biggest oil source, ahead of all the OPEC members. The Department of Energy’s Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves estimates oil shale’s direct economic value to the nation might approach $1 trillion by 2020, not counting other equally or more valuable strategic and national security benefits that may not be fully measured in dollars.

- Total recoverable deposits represent a resource valued at nearly $100 trillion dollars at current oil prices, and considerably more at projected prices.

In addition, when it comes to supporting domestic energy independence, Republicans have demonstrated a clear record:

ANWR Exploration
House Republicans: 91% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Coal-to-Liquid
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 78% Opposed

Oil Shale Exploration
House Republicans: 90% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration
House Republicans: 81% Supported
House Democrats: 83% Opposed

Refinery Increased Capacity
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 96% Opposed

1 Comment

 

Jun 06

One of two speeches commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the D-Day Invasion, this speech was delivered at the site of the U.S. Ranger Monument at Pointe du Hoc, France, where veterans of the Normandy Invasion, and others, had assembled for the ceremony. Later during the day, President Reagan spoke at Omaha Beach, France.

“We’re here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For four long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved, and the world prayed for its rescue. Here in Normandy the rescue began. Here the Allies stood and fought against tyranny in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history.

We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but 40 years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, 225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs. Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance.

The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers–the edge of the cliffs shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe. Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After two days of fighting, only 90 could still bear arms.

Behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there.

These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war.

Gentlemen, I look at you and I think of the words of Stephen Spender’s poem. You are men who in your “lives fought for life . . . and left the vivid air signed with your honor.”

I think I know what you may be thinking right now–thinking, “We were just part of a bigger effort; everyone was brave that day.” Well, everyone was. Do you remember the story of Bill Millin of the 51st Highlanders? Forty years ago today, British troops were pinned down near a bridge, waiting desperately for help. Suddenly, they heard the sound of bagpipes, and some thought they were dreaming. Well, they weren’t. They looked up and saw Bill Millin with his bagpipes, leading the reinforcements and ignoring the smack of the bullets into the ground around him.

Lord Lovat was with him–Lord Lovat of Scotland, who calmly announced when he got to the bridge, “Sorry I’m a few minutes late,” as if he’d been delayed by a traffic jam, when in truth he’d just come from the bloody fighting on Sword Beach, which he and his men had just taken.

There was the impossible valor of the Poles who threw themselves between the enemy and the rest of Europe as the invasion took hold, and the unsurpassed courage of the Canadians who had already seen the horrors of war on this coast. They knew what awaited them there, but they would not be deterred. And once they hit Juno Beach, they never looked back.

All of these men were part of a rollcall of honor with names that spoke of a pride as bright as the colors they bore: the Royal Winnipeg Rifles, Poland’s 24th Lancers, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, the Screaming Eagles, the Yeomen of England’s armored divisions, the forces of Free France, the Coast Guard’s “Matchbox Fleet” and you, the American Rangers.

Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet, you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief; it was loyalty and love.

The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge–and pray God we have not lost it–that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt.

You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One’s country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it’s the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew the people of your countries were behind you.

The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They thought–or felt in their hearts, though they couldn’t know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m., in Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell.

Something else helped the men of D-Day: their rock-hard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer he told them: Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we’re about to do. Also that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkness for the promise God made to Joshua: “I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.”

These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies.

When the war was over, there were lives to be rebuilt and governments to be returned to the people. There were nations to be reborn. Above all, there was a new peace to be assured. These were huge and daunting tasks. But the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They rebuilt a new Europe together.

There was first a great reconciliation among those who had been enemies, all of whom had suffered so greatly. The United States did its part, creating the Marshall Plan to help rebuild our allies and our former enemies. The Marshall Plan led to the Atlantic alliance–a great alliance that serves to this day as our shield for freedom, for prosperity, and for peace.

In spite of our great efforts and successes, not all that followed the end of the war was happy or planned. Some liberated countries were lost. The great sadness of this loss echoes down to our own time in the streets of Warsaw, Prague, and East Berlin. Soviet troops that came to the center of this continent did not leave when peace came. They’re still there, uninvited, unwanted, unyielding, almost 40 years after the war. Because of this, Allied forces still stand on this continent. Today, as 40 years ago, our armies are here for only one purpose–to protect and defend democracy. The only territories we hold are memorials like this one and graveyards where our heroes rest.

We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect the peace than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We’ve learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent.

But we try always to be prepared for peace; prepared to deter aggression; prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms; and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever.

It’s fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II: 20 million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the Earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.

We will pray forever that some day that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.

We are bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We’re bound by reality. The strength of America’s allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe’s democracies. We were with you then; we are with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.

Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: “I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.”

Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their value [valor], and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.

Thank you very much, and God bless you all.”

Note: The President spoke at 1:20 p.m. at the site of the U.S. Ranger Monument at Pointe du Hoc, France, where veterans of the Normandy invasion had assembled for the ceremony.

Following his remarks, the President unveiled memorial plaques to the 2nd and 5th Ranger Battalions. Then, escorted by Phil Rivers, superintendent of the Normandy American Cemetery, the President and Mrs. Reagan proceeded to the interior of the observation bunker. On leaving the bunker, the President and Mrs. Reagan greeted each of the veterans.

Other Allied countries represented at the ceremony by their heads of state and government were: Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands, King Olav V of Norway, King Baudouin I of Belgium, Grand Duke Jean of Luxembourg, and Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau of Canada.

No Comments